Archive for the ‘Blog’ Category

Ma. citizens. HD4220 is an anti-gun bill that is being pushed by dictator wannabes in the legislature. No one went to them asking for this, it is self-serving on their part.

It will force law enforcement officers to choose, they swore an oath, in part to uphold the Constitution and to uphold the public trust. If they enforce this bill, they shred the Constitution and how would the public be able to trust them ever again? They would in essence become state sanctioned thug/thieves.

Why? Because the firearms that they will be trying to steal from you were bought legally, recognized as legal by the state, the state took their share in the taxes generated, they are YOUR legally possessed firearms!

A short summary: It will ban ALL semi auto rifles/shotguns you own; you must show proof of destroying them or turn them in. ALL semi auto handguns must have magazines with serial numbers or be turned in. This is retroactive to 1994! All firearms that you can have must be REGISTERED within 7 days of the bill passing! All gun owners that do not comply will be felons, imprisoned for 10 years! I do not have room to go into the whole thing, research it. Police Chiefs from around the state are beginning to write letters of protest about this unconstitutional bill. This bill endangers police who would try to enforce it. It may take effect at end of July! Pass it on!

Mark Shean

Author of GUN SENSE.

All Ma. citizens. Legislators in Ma. are trying to fast track bill HD4420 by the end of July!
It will ban all semi auto rifles.
Eliminate conceal carry.
Outlaw all magazines without a serial number.
force registration of any part added to a firearm.
Limit the ability of anyone trying to get required training for a license!
Force retailers to get names and address of anyone buying mags. and ammo!
And more! This bill is unconstitutional, a criminal infringement by criminals in gov.

Absolutely NOTHING in this outlandish ‘bill’ does one single solitary thing to keep real criminals from committing crimes. This ‘bill’ is an outright attack on all law-abiding citizens of the state, nothing more, nothing less.
Pass it on!

Mark Shean

Author of GUN SENSE

Credibility,

I am a small arms firearms expert, documented as such through yearly/quarterly testing by the federal NRC over the last 35 years. That equates to 140 plus firearm timed qualification tests with revolver, shotgun, pistol and rifle, 560 documented expert scores. I have been an NRA LE instructor and am currently an NRA civilian instructor and a state firearm safety instructor in Ma. I have been involved in organized shooting since 1963. This is no hobby, and I’m not a weekend warrior.

Factual Observation,

I personally can honestly say that I do not know what an ‘assault’ weapon is. I do know ‘assault’ is a behavior, it is not any specific firearm. For example, you can be assaulted by a person stabbing you with a pencil or throwing a hot cup of coffee on you. Amusingly the director of the ATF cannot define what an ‘assault weapon’ is while he is under oath. I can say without hesitation that it is a made-up phony term used by anyone with an agenda to strip our Second Amendment birthright away from all U.S. citizens, nothing more, nothing less.

Beware of all who would use the term “assault weapon”.

Mark Shean

Author of GUN SENSE

Breaking news! Bragg will be filing another even more heinous crime against Trump. Bragg has irrefutable evidence that Trump removed a mattress tag in 1987, Bragg’s office states that this is a class one felony that carries with it the death penalty upon conviction. Bragg says he is confident he will win this case at trial. No one is above the law brags Bragg!

Mark Shean Reporting

See Italian attorney’s  sworn statement at the bottom of this post.

PRESS RELEASE: Rome, Italy (January 5, 2021) – An employee of the 8th largest global defense contractor, Leonardo SpA, provided a shocking deposition detailing his role in the most elaborate criminal act affecting a US election. Corroborating the DNI Ratcliff’s report of international intrusion, Arturo D’elio outlined the scheme that proved successful in using Leonardo computer systems and military satellites located in Pescara, Italy. Recent reports of a hack at Leonardo now appear to have been an orchestrated cover to mitigate blowback on the corporation which is partially owned by the Italian government. Read more.

Conte, Leonardo SpA and the U.S. Embassy behind the Election Data witch fraud to take out Trump
An Italian news source reports the following: Leonardo SpA, formerly known as Finmeccanica underwent a name change in January 2017. According to individuals who carried out the data switch operation under the direction of US intelligence officials in the American Embassy, they utilized one of Leonardo’s advanced military spec (cyber warfare) satellites to transmit manipulated votes back to Frankfurt servers and on to the United States, as reported by the journalist Cesare Sacchetti. Leonardo S.p.A. it is the largest industrial company in Italy and is active in the fields of defense, aerospace and cyber security. READ MORE & SEE PICS HERE

WVW Broadcast Network Columnists By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | January 11, 2021

Raw data analytics exclusively obtained by The American Report show that during the 2020 presidential election internet protocol (IP) addresses in China, Russia, Hong Kong, Germany, Canada, and the Czech Republic hacked into IP addresses in the battleground states of Pennsylvania, Nevada, Michigan and Georgia.

IP addresses owned by Chinese telecom enterprise Huawei Cloud and Huawei’s headquarters hacked into IP addresses in Pennsylvania on November 3, 2020, the data analysis shows. A Huawei-owned IP address also hacked an IP address in Michigan.

IP addresses owned by Chinese state-owned telecommunications operator China Unicom also hacked into IP addresses in Pennsylvania on November 3.

IP addresses owned by Chinese internet provider ChinaNet hacked into IP addresses in Nevada on November 3, according to the data analysis.

Aliyun Computing Co. owns several IP addresses that hacked into IP addresses in Michigan on November 3, the data analysis shows. Alibaba Cloud, a subsidiary of Alibaba Group, is also known as Aliyun. Alibaba founder Jack Ma has not been seen in weeks.

An IP address owned by Kaspersky Lab – Moscow hacked into an IP address in Michigan on November 3, according to the data analysis. Kaspersky is a Russian software and cybersecurity firm. Kasperky Lab was co-founded by Eugene Kaspersky and his now-ex-wife, Natalya Kaspersky.

READ MORE AT THE AMERICAN REPORT:

https://theamericanreport.org/2021/01/11/exclusive-proof-china-russia-hacked-2020-election-ip-addresses-in-china-russia-hong-kong-germany-canada-czech-republic-hacked-pa-nv-mi-ga-battleground-states-raw-data-analytics-show/

 – Why did the chicken cross the road?

DONALD TRUMP: All Mexican chickens who wish to cross this road must submit to a complete background check, and full body search.

BARACK OBAMA: Let me be perfectly clear, if the chickens like their eggs they can keep their eggs. No chicken will be required to cross the road to surrender her eggs. Period.

JOHN McCain: My friends, the chicken crossed the road because he recognized the need to engage in cooperation and dialogue with all the chickens on the other side of the road.

HILLARY CLINTON: What difference at this point does it make why the chicken crossed the road.

DICK CHENEY: Where’s my gun?

COLIN POWELL: Now to the left of the screen, you can clearly see the satellite image of the chicken crossing the road.

BILL CLINTON: I did not cross the road with that chicken.

AL GORE: I invented the chicken.

JOHN KERRY: Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now against it! It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the chicken’s intentions. I am not for it now, and will remain against it.

AL SHARPTON: Why are all the chickens white?

DR. PHIL: The problem we have here is that this chicken won’t realize that he must first deal with the problem on this side of the road before it goes after the problem on the other side of the road. What we need to do is help him realize how stupid he is acting by not taking on his current problems before adding any new problems.

OPRAH: Well, I understand that the chicken is having problems, which is why he wants to cross the road so badly. So instead of having the chicken learn from his mistakes and take falls, which is a part of life, I’m going to give this chicken a NEW CAR so that he can just drive across the road and not live his life like the rest of the chickens.

ANDERSON COOPER: We have reason to believe there is a chicken, but we have not yet been allowed to have access to the other side of the road.

NANCY GRACE: That chicken crossed the road because he’s guilty! You can see it in his eyes and the way he walks.

MARTHA STEWART: No one called me to warn me which way the chicken was going. I had a standing order at the Farmer’s Market to sell my eggs when the price dropped to a certain level. No little bird gave me any insider information. DR SEUSS: Did the chicken cross the road? Did he cross it with a toad? Yes, the chicken crossed the road, but why it crossed I’ve not been told.

ERNEST HEMINGWAY: To die in the rain, alone.

JERRY FALWELL: Because the chicken was gay! Can’t you people see the plain truth? That’s why they call it the ‘other side.’ Yes, my friends, that chicken was gay. If you eat that chicken, you will become gay too. I say we boycott all chickens until we sort out this abomination that the Liberal media whitewashes with seemingly harmless phrases like ‘the other side.’ That chicken should not be crossing the road. It’s as plain and as simple as that.

GRANDPA: In my day we didn’t ask why the chicken crossed the road. Somebody told us the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough for us.

BARBARA WALTERS: Isn’t that interesting? In a few moments, we will be listening to the chicken tell, for the first time, the heartwarming story of how it experienced a serious case of molting, and went on to accomplish its lifelong dream of crossing the road.

ARISTOTLE: It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.

JOHN LENNON: Imagine all the chickens in the world crossing roads together, in peace.

BILL GATES: I have just released e-Chicken 2015, which will not only cross roads, but will lay eggs, file your important documents and balance your checkbook. Internet Explorer is an integral part of e-Chicken 2015. This new platform is much more stable and will never reboot.

Mike Pence: I am a chicken.
ALBERT EINSTEIN: Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road move beneath the chicken?

COLONEL SANDERS: Did I miss one?????

Dear Director Wray,

It has come to my attention that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has informed several Missouri county sheriffs that they will be showing up in August to “audit” CCW permit holder records. The FBI states, “The audit includes an onsite review of your Concealed Carry Weapons Permits”… Let me be perfectly clear. Allowing federal agents from the FBI to have access to records of Missourians who have a permit to carry a concealed weapon violates Missouri law and infringes on our Second Amendment rights.

Missouri law specifically prohibits sharing this confidential list with the federal government. “Information retained in the concealed carry permit system under this subsection shall not be distributed to any federal, state, or private entities….” 571.101.9, RSMo. The people’s elected representatives passed this law after it became known that the Obama Administration wanted to know which Missourians had firearms, supposedly to establish who was entitled to federal benefits. We wanted to leave no doubt that the citizens of Missouri have a constitutional right to bear arms, and the federal government has no business poking around to find out their identities.

I was a state senator when this law was passed, and I proudly voted for it. In fact, we deliberately wrote the state law so that only the elected county sheriff had access to the CCW list you are trying to get. Here in the heartland, we elect our county sheriffs, who are members of our communities. The same cannot be said for your out of touch FBI.

You may wonder why there is such strong suspicion of federal agents here in the “Show Me State”. Simply put, Missourians are hardworking, law-abiding citizens who don’t need a national nanny-state keeping tabs on us. But more than that, over the last couple of years, we’ve seen story after story of incompetence and corruption at the highest levels of the FBI. Our trust in your agency is at an all-time low.

Here are a few examples of how the Biden Administration and liberal “deep-staters” within the FBI have severely tarnished the reputation of this once well-respected agency. You famously targeted the parents of school children who showed up to express their concerns at school board meetings. Unbelievably, somehow this was done as an alleged violation of the PATRIOT Act.

In addition to targeting parents, your agency has targeted conservatives, most famously the witch-hunt against President Trump and his team. James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and others endlessly investigated fake allegations fabricated by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic operatives. Yet while it persecutes conservatives, the FBI turns a blind eye to Democrats. The FBI inexplicably cleared Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing and has been sitting on evidence of criminal activity on Hunter Biden’s laptop for years.

Now the FBI appears to be targeting Missouri gun owners, and we will not stand for it. We believe in the Second Amendment here. So does the Supreme Court, as you may have seen in the recent landmark opinion. In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, I led dozens of state attorneys general in filing a brief defending our Second Amendment rights, and we prevailed.

In light of all these facts, Missourians have concluded that the FBI leadership in Washington, D.C. has been weaponized for political goals. You have lost our trust and you seem to be completely indifferent toward trying to rebuild it. Instead, you announce that you will show up at the offices of our elected Missouri sheriffs in open and blatant violation of our state law and seek to find out who in Missouri holds a legal CCW permit. This is not going to happen. I will fight you tooth and nail with all the resources that the people of Missouri have given me as their Attorney General.

Very Truly Yours,

Eric S. Schmitt

Attorney General

Illegal aliens are being smuggled into America by OUR government, on OUR dime and flown all over the country into our cities. They do not need to get the ‘jab’ like American citizens are threatened to do if they want to fly, they do not need to show a valid ID like American citizens are required to do, they can bypass the search process at airports that American citizens cannot! Our government is at war with its legal citizens, WAKE UP AND REALIZE IT!!!

An email from our Friends of the Convention of States. Why not copy and send to your legislators in DC? 5450 words. Also, repealing the 16th and 17th amendments will go a long ways to corralling these snakes, rats and parasites in DC. They would FLEE DC VERY fast if they could be repealed….Just sayin’.

WE THE PEOPLE of the Convention of States movement declare that the United States government has failed to secure the rights of the American people as called for in the Declaration of Independence. Instead, the federal government, dominated by career politicians, has usurped power from the people and the states over many decades, effectively dismantling the principles of federalism that the founding fathers forged into the U.S. Constitution.

We now issue this Open Letter to the States to communicate our grievances with the federal government:

It has amassed a $30+ trillion national debt with $150 trillion in unfunded liabilities.
It regularly fails to balance its budget, as most states are required to do.
It is not held to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as all businesses are.
Congress is not required to limit all bills to a single subject, as most states are, leading to massive omnibus federal spending bills.
Congress unconstitutionally delegates its sole authority to make laws to an unelected bureaucracy.
The judicial branch unconstitutionally encroaches on the sole authority of Congress to make laws by legislating from the bench.
The executive branch unconstitutionally encroaches on the sole authority of Congress to make laws through executive orders which change drastically from one administration to another.
Federal elected officials are accountable to their political parties and special interest groups rather than to their constituents.
Congress regularly oversteps its constitutionally limited powers in the areas of education, healthcare, energy, the environment and many more.
It has failed to secure the U.S. border, thus increasing drug and human trafficking and allowing a flow of illegal immigrants who become reliant on services funded by taxpayer dollars.
It has, at times, made efforts to undermine the Bill of Rights, weaken the justice system, disarm the populace, suppress free speech, regulate religious freedom, and control the mainstream media narrative.
The unconstitutional Department of Education promotes Critical Race Theory (CRT) and radical sexual/gender ideology in schools.
It promotes woke ideologies as a replacement for Judeo-Christian values and patriotic national identity.
Federal officials make prominent government appointments on the basis of race, sex, or sexual orientation rather than strictly on legitimate professional qualifications.
It employs destructive Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) scoring, which run counter to a free market economy.
Congress and unelected bureaucrats force health mandates upon the citizenry.
Federal officials execute unconstitutional government surveillance of law-abiding citizens.
It suppresses domestic energy independence, causing high fuel prices, food shortages, national blackouts, and dependence on imports from unfriendly countries.
Federal officials attempt to embrace international treaties that threaten the sovereignty of the United States and override domestic laws.
Federal officials weaponize federal agencies to suppress political opponents.
Federal officials have threatened to dismantle the Electoral College and pack the Supreme Court.
In addition, the federal government has squandered the wealth of its citizenry through unfair and excessive taxation in the name of unconstitutional social programs, an excessive welfare state, expenditures for political gain, and massive deceitful spending disguised as a rescue strategy.

On September 15, 2022, we will recognize the 235th anniversary of the unanimous adoption of Article V into the Constitution, and we, the undersigned, believe Article V holds the key to correcting these and other abuses of power.

Article V defines the process for amending the Constitution. Amendments can be proposed by Congress with a 2/3 vote of each house or by a Convention of the States when requested by 2/3 (34) of the state legislatures. Any proposed amendment, whether proposed by Congress or a Convention of the States, must be ratified by 3/4 (38) states before it becomes effective as part of the constitution.

We hereby call on our elected state legislators to exercise their authority under Article V of the U.S. Constitution to propose amendments that Congress would never propose – placing fiscal restraints on the federal government, imposing term limits on federal officials, and limiting the power, scope, and jurisdiction of the federal government.

Nineteen of the 34 necessary states have already exercised their constitutional authority to call for an amendment-proposing convention to restrain our out-of-control federal government.

We, the undersigned, hereby urge the remaining states to rise to defend our Republic against the growing threat of a tyrannical federal government and reclaim their rightful constitutional powers by calling for a Convention of States.

Convention of States Action is a 501c(4) non-profit organization working across the nation to encourage state legislators to call an Article V Convention of the States in order to limit federal government authority and return power back to local and state governments and, above all, to The People, from which government derives its authority.

NOTE, I sincerely hope the number of states needed come together to make this happen!!

Massachusetts police chiefs should no longer deny or impose restrictions on licenses to carry a gun just because the applicant doesn’t have a “good reason” to carry, the state’s attorney general said in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

Attorney General Maura Healey released guidance Friday for police chiefs in the wake of the decision overturning a gun-permitting law in New York. Under that law, New York residents needed to show proper cause, or an actual need, to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense.

Healey’s guidance says that Massachusetts police chiefs can still find applicants ineligible for a license if they are a “prohibited person,” or if the chief deems the person unsuitable to carry a gun because they would pose a risk to public safety.

Police can also still ask applicants their reasons for applying for a license to carry. But they can no longer deny or restrict licenses because they believe the person doesn’t have a “good reason,” according to Healey’s office.

“Going forward, if an applicant is not a prohibited person and is not unsuitable, the applicant must be issued an unrestricted license to carry,” the guidance from Healey, a Democrat, says.

*Massachusetts’ law says those deemed suitable can get a license to carry if they show “good reason to fear injury” to themselves or their property “or for any other reason,” including “for use in sport or target practice only.”

*Massachusetts courts previously ruled that if someone can’t show a “good reason to fear injury,” police chiefs can put restrictions on licenses that allow them to only carry in certain circumstances.

*In some communities, applicants have had to show they have a reason to fear injury that distinguishes them from the general population in order to get an unrestricted license. If they didn’t show a good reason, licenses were restricted for certain purposes, like hunting and target practice.

*Last three paragraphs; NOTE: (This just changed as of 6-30-22, as noted in first paragraph above)

Mark Shean, 7-5-22